A Potentially Historic Tennis Match, That I Mostly Missed (Despite Being a Huge Tennis Fan)

Imagine waiting nearly a quarter-century for something you deemed important to happen – in fact, desperately wanted to happen – and then all but ignored it the very day it could have happened.

Imagine tuning it out while millions of others tuned it in, all because you couldn’t bear the thought of watching it.

Imagine how that might change your entire perspective on what you once thought you held dear.

This was me on Sunday afternoon, during the men’s singles final of the U.S. Open Tennis Championship. I barely paid attention to it – even though I’m a huge, U.S.-born tennis fan, and had a chance to see an American man win a major singles championship for the first time since 2003. This was such a big deal to me I even blogged about it a few years ago.

It should have been an epic moment. Instead, it was a lesson in how we categorize what’s important – all the way up to the moment when we discover it wasn’t that important after all.

*****

This year’s U.S. Open final pitted Ben Shelton of the United States against Alexander (aka Sasha) Zverev of Germany. Shelton was the decided underdog, having never beaten Zverev in five previous meetings.

But Big Ben had been on a hot streak of late, winning an important tournament in Canada over the summer, and taking out 7-time major champion Carlos Alcarez in the U.S. Open quarterfinals (yes, Carlos had been off the tour for months dealing with an injury, and Shelton still needed a fifth-set tiebreaker to beat him, but still….).

The U.S. Open final between Shelton and Zverev was potentially historic beyond just the fact that an American man had a chance to end a 23-year major championship singles drought.

With a win, Shelton also would have been the first African American male to win a major title since 1975, when Arthur Ashe won Wimbledon (well, partly; Ben is mixed-race). No black man anywhere has won a major tennis title since 1983, when France’s Yannick Noah won the French Open.

So there was a lot at stake in this match. And normally I would have been glued to the TV, watching every point.

But not this time. Instead of being glued to it, I only caught bits and pieces. Every so often I’d break away from the football game I was watching and pop into the tennis match. But I never stuck around for very long.

The fact that I even wrote the above sentences is sort of insane, given my long love affair with tennis.

I’ve played and followed the sport religiously since 1971, when my parents bought me a Wilson Jack Kramer wooden racket. In no time at all I found myself spending countless hours at the local tennis/swim club, pounding the ball back and forth, back and forth, with anyone who wanted to play.

I played a number of junior events as a youngster, got pretty good at it, and continued to play anyone, everywhere, for decades. Even now, I rarely miss a day hitting the tennis ball.

Beyond that, I also watch tennis pretty much every day. I pay yearly subscriptions to both the Tennis Channel and Tennis TV, and catch matches at all professional levels on whatever device is handy (TV, laptop, iPhone).

I can probably name 40 of the world’s top 50 male players off the top of my head, and maybe 60 of the top 100. I’m not sure I can name 30 players in any other sport, even though I used to be a major fanatic of baseball, football and basketball.

From a fan standpoint, men’s tennis is the only sport in which I still have a decent level of expertise. And being a tennis expert, I know that the last time an American man won a major singles championship was in 2003, when Andy Roddick captured the U.S. Open title.

Since then, they’ve been shut down and shut out. Nearly a quarter-century of futility at the U.S. Open, Australian Open, French Open and Wimbledon. Twenty-three GD years.

That’s just incredible. Unimaginable. Impossible. Yet there it is.

*****

Being a stat geek, I ran some numbers to put the current U.S. men’s drought in context. Here are some of those numbers:

  • During the first 23 years of tennis’ Open era (1968-90), American men won 23 major singles titles.
  • During the next 13 years (1991-2003), American men won 26 major titles. Look at that number again.
  • Between 1968 and 2003, the longest drought between major singles titles for American men was four years – they came up empty in 1985, 1986, 1987 and 1988. Other than that, they never went longer than a year without winning one.
  • During the last 23 years (2004-2026), American men have won exactly zero major titles. There have been 91 major tennis tournaments since then (Wimbledon was canceled by COVID in 2000). In all that time, American men have only reached a major final six times.

You have to remind yourself that before the current winless streak started, U.S. men dominated tennis. From 1989 through 2002, Pete Sampras, Andre Agassi, Jim Courier and Michael Chang combined to win 27 major singles titles. You’d see at least one of them in a major final nearly all the time. Often they’d play each other in the final.

Over the past quarter-century, Americans have similarly dominated women’s tennis, thanks largely to the Williams sisters. Serena (23) and Venus (7) won 30 majors themselves. A total of six American women have won major singles titles over the past 23 years, while zero American men have.

That last number – zero – could have changed this past Sunday with a Ben Shelton win.

You’d think I’d have been jacked up about it, yes?

Yes, you’d think. You’d certainly think.

But I couldn’t even tune in. Couldn’t even bring myself to watch.

The problem wasn’t Ben Shelton – though, truth be told, I would have preferred another American to compete for the title.

I still have a bitter taste in my mouth after Shelton did his sillyass little “hanging up the phone” victory celebration when he beat fellow American Frances Tiafoe in the 2023 U.S. Open. Ben could have just won and acted like a GD professional, respected his opponent. But no. He had to put on his little show for the crowd and his own ego.

At the time, Shelton hadn’t really won a f**king thing. It was a quarterfinal match. A round later, he got his ass handed to him in straight sets by Novak Djokovic (who clowned Shelton afterward by imitating the “hang up the phone” gesture, which was sort of awesome).

Shelton apparently did the gesture again after upsetting Alcaraz in this year’s Open.

Christ, how sick I am of modern athletes feeling the urge to come up with some TikTok-friendly jagoff gesture every time they do something good during a game or match. It’s so trite and predictable and boring anymore. Just stop already. It’s not that clever. You’re not that cute.

Let’s just move on…..

That wasn’t why I sat out Sunday’s Shelton-Zverev final. The reason was Ben’s opponent, Sasha Zverev. Here’s a guy I cannot stand watching on the tennis court. Simply cannot stand. As talented as he is – and he is, he is – watching him on the tennis court is not unlike having your eyeballs splashed with acid.

I can’t remember the last time I actually watched Sasha Zverev play an entire match. Probably when I saw him play live at the ATP Finals in London back in 2018. And then I had no choice, because the guy was right there in front of me.

Have you ever watched Zverev play tennis? If you have, then you’ll know what I’m talking about. If you haven’t, then here’s all you need to know: It takes the dude forever to serve. For-ev-er. Seriously, he bounces the ball 13, 14, 15 times before every serve. Every GD time. Over and over. He pushes the serve clock to the brink every time. Every GD time.

Players are supposed to get 25 seconds from the end of the previous point to start their service motion. Zverev takes 24.98 seconds. Nah, check that – he probably takes more than 25 seconds, but the chair umpire lets him get away with it.

This is excruciating to watch. It’s not just me who thinks so, either. Google “why does Zverev take so long to serve” and you get nearly 32 million results, including links to this and this and this and this and this and on and on and on.

It takes me about one game of watching Zverev go through his ball-bouncing routine before I change the channel. I can’t watch it. Won’t watch it. It kills the enjoyment; sucks the life out of the whole affair. It gets in my head and stays there and makes me want to smash things.

He’s not the only offender, by the way. Novak Djokovic has been doing the same thing for two decades. I can’t watch him play, either, and will not mourn his imminent retirement the same way I mourned the retirements of fellow Big Three tennis legends Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal.

Croatia’s Maran Cilic does the same thing – bouncing, bouncing, bouncing – and I cannot wait for him to finally hang up his racket and move the hell along.

I feel the same way about Sasha Zverev, so I didn’t watch him whip Big Ben’s ass in the U.S. Open men’s final. I don’t know if that’s a sad commentary on me or tennis or Sasha or all of the above.

What I do know is that as much as I think I love tennis, I have limits on what I will endure as a fan. Which mainly means that I don’t love it as much as I think I do. It’s not unconditional love, at any rate. It’s love with an asterisk.

I love playing tennis. But I don’t always love watching it. And really, playing it is more important than watching it. This could apply to any element of life, when you think about it.

Being an active participant in the arena is always better than being a passive spectator. On your deathbed, you might not remember the stuff other people did. But you will remember the stuff you did. I consider that a positive thing.

And you know another positive thing?

I didn’t have to see another American man get taken down in a major tennis championship.

Again.

Image: Sasha bouncing the ball interminably, Ben crying while doing the “hang up the phone” gesture, and fans angry at it all.

9 Comments

  1. Vance, players have 25 seconds from the end of a point to begin their first-serve motion…but the second serve has no specific limit. Of course the question is…why? Why in heaven’s name do you think the current rules (or lack thereof) are what they are? Did rule makers assume people would hit their second serve immediately only because that is what players actually used to do?

    As for player celebrations, I think all our sports now feature acting out after the simplest of acts. The days when Barry Sanders just handed the ball back to the official after scoring a touchdown are gone for good. Baseball particularly annoys me with the dugout circus acts. Grown men have never looked more ridiculous…just getting on base is wildly celebrated.

    All my sports love these days comes with a big ol’ asterisk (especially college sports), and if something I am watching irks me, I have other things to do and enjoy. Used to live for sports…not so much now,

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Bruce, thanks for the feedback. I’m in the same mindset you are in terms of sports. I used to live for them, but no more. I think part of it is just reaching a certain age because really, after 50-60 years of watching sports it’s hard to be surprised by anything anymore.

      And part of it is what you mentioned, about the end of the days when someone like Barry Sanders would just hand the ball back to the ref. I often think about that. Dr. J making some spectacular move before throwing down a monster dunk and not so much as pumping a fist. He’d just run back down and play defense, no celebration. Hank Aaron hitting a homer and quietly circling the bases. I mean, players today have their little celebratory gestures after hitting a single.

      But times change, and what we value isn’t necessarily what the later generations value. I understand and accept that. But I don’t have to like it…. 🙂

      As for tennis — the serve clock rules don’t make any sense, especially not starting it before the second serve. I think they should start the clock as soon as the chair umpire announces the score or the start of the game and have it last no more than 15 seconds. And it shouldn’t end when the player goes into the service motion because that’s pretty subjective. It should end when the ball is actually served. For the second serve, start it as soon as fault or let is called and make it 10 seconds.

      I do feel like they’ll need to change the rules. It’s become ridiculous.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I’m with you on Zverev, but I actually don’t mind the Shelton phone celebration as much. At least the kid has some personality, which is more than you can say for half the tour. Still, totally understand why you tuned out.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That’s the thing about Shelton — he does have a big personality. He’s a smart guy, with a good sense of humor and a lot of energy and charisma. Tennis needs that. Which is why I got annoyed by the “hang up the phone” gesture because it seems like the kind of thing a 12-year-old would do after setting a new video game record or something. Not a highly ranked tennis player with plenty of brains.

      I guess I just didn’t see the point of doing it, even though in the grand scheme of things it’s pretty unimportant.

      I appreciate your feedback and can see your side of things as well. Plenty of others feel the same way you do.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I can definitely see and understand your frustration with Zverev’s serve length, I’ve definitely been frustrated with his serve preparation time having seen him play in person at events like the Cincinnati Open. Although, I believe you definitely gotta respect the pros for all the hard work they put in, no matter whether it’s Roger Federer, Ben Shelton, Carlos Alcaraz, or even Alexander Zverev. They all put in the work to go out and play long matches, train for large tournaments, and more. The US Open was definitely depressing to watch considering the men haven’t won a major singles title for about 23 years, but we aren’t necessarily taking a backwards step. As you said and as many tennis fans might know, Shelton won the Montreal Open, although it’s not a Grand Slam, we’ve still got a possibility to capture the win in the future. Maybe it’ll be Shelton, maybe it won’t. Maybe the opponent will have more very long serves, but also indeed maybe not. Just because we haven’t won a singles title in 23 years doesn’t mean that it’ll stretch to 25 or even 26 years.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for sharing your insights, much appreciated.

      I definitely have the utmost respect for all pro tennis players who manage to get into the top 100 and even top 200. As you say, it takes incredible commitment to get to the highest levels. Just day after day of hard work and training, with no teammates to fall back on in case you’re not at your best on match day. The players ranked below 100 might have it even tougher because they have to play the qualification rounds at the Tour level and compete in a lot of Challengers, without nearly as much prize money to pay for travel, coaches, trainers, etc.

      I have this firm belief that elite tennis players are the best athletes in the world based on the combination of fitness, endurance, quickness/speed, strength, power, finesse, movement in all directions, hand-eye coordination, and mental toughness.

      I think Ben has the best chance to break the American majors drought. He has the right combination of power and belief, and he’s working on his returns and baseline game. I expect at some point he’ll win one in the next few years. Maybe other Americans, too, if all the cards fall just right (like not having to face Carlos or Jannick).

      Thanks again for sharing!

      Like

Leave a Reply